5 Lies About Climate Change Not Supported By Science
June 29, 2013
President Obama made clear his position on climate change last week when he announced his administration’s plans to control CO2 emissions from both citizens and corporations in the domestic US.
By calling climate skeptics members of the Flat Earth Society, a division between alarmist claims and empirical scientific data was laid.
Obama said: “We don’t have time for a meeting of the flat-Earth society. Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it’s not going to protect you from the coming storm.”
In an ironic twist, the president of the Flat Earth Society said that he believes in man-made climate change.
In 2012, the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (YPCCC) is injecting propaganda into the American social meme to convince the general public that man-made global warming is real and their fault.
The YPCCC, through alleged scientific study, has surmised that climate change skeptics lack fundamental cognitive capabilities which impede their ability to grasp complex concepts. In other words – the globalists think skeptics are stupid.
Senator Mitch McConnell said that by declaring a war on coal, Obama effectively declared “a war on jobs. “It’s tantamount to kicking the ladder out from beneath the feet of many Americans struggling in today’s economy.”
Currently 40% of energy produced in America is derived from coal and this initiative would drive costs for electricity through the roof for residents and businesses.
During his 1st presidential campaign in 2008, Obama admitted that he would seek to bankrupt any corporations building a coal plant because of greenhouse emissions and in the name of climate change.
Proof of their fear-mongering has been exposed with developments in Climategate and Penn State professor Michael Mann who created the infamous “hockey stick graph” that became the crux of climate change alarmists and was an absolute fabrication.
Mann and his theory influenced an entire movement to intentionally manipulate scientific data to make global warming appear direr than it actually is.
This scheme has involved such agencies and governmental bodies as:
• The US Environmental Protection Agency
• The National Science Foundation
• The British House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
• Penn State University
• Various independent panels
New data published shows that rising temperatures between 1997 and August of 2012 have shown no discernible aggregation and demonstrate a “plateau” on global warming. Figures prior to that period were observed as stable or declining for the previous 4 decades.
The research shows a clear cooling trend while alarmists continue to claim that the planet is heating up and because of human activity and greenhouse gas emissions, there must be severe restrictions in industrialized nations before we cross “the tipping point”.
Klaus–Ekart Puls, physicist and meteorologist points out that climate change is normal as the planet goes through phases of climate warming “many that even far exceeded the extent we see today. But there hasn’t been any warming since 1998. In fact the IPCC suppliers of data even show a slight cooling.”
He explains that the IPCC climate change computer models are based on “speculative model projections, so-called scenarios – and not prognoses. Because of climate’s high complexity, reliable prognoses just aren’t possible.”
Alarmist scientists have come forth to disagree with the findings of this study. And those professors who work for climate change departments at prestigious universities have a personal investment in the continuation of climate change research. Should the public consensus shift to only accept scientific data and not the alarmist perspective, those professors would be out of a job.
The Heritage Foundation commented that according to Obama’s plan to phase out coal, the cost of natural gas would be driven up by 42% by 2030.
In fact, the Controlling Elite have paved the way for this move toward “greener energy” by purchasing carbon credits to offset their lavish lifestyles and earnings derived from greenhouse emitting sources of energy.
Americans are broke , living paycheck-to-paycheck with virtually no savings. The expectation for an exorbitant increase in energy bills will send most into dire situations.
In 2012, a study was released by the Met Office Hadley Center, showing the there has been no significant warming in global temperatures since 1997.
And this is the remarks from alarmists who want to believe that human activity is the sole reason for global changes in the earth’s weather patterns. It suits their agenda to maintain this ideology within the general public, despite empirical scientific data streaming in to their contrary.
The lie of more extreme weather in recent years due to man-made climate change has been mostly a right of ignorance by the general public who believe what they are told instead of looking at the actual data collected over time which shows that this is not the case.
When the information is analyzed it shows:
• Tornadoes have decreased significantly since 1954
• Hurricane activity is down
• Snow cover is up as of 2011
• Climate in the US has remained temperate; being neither more wet or dry
• Heat indexes are not being set with record highs, but rather showing a temperate trend
• Real world observation discredits climate models which are the sole basis for climate science alarmism
In response, alarmists claimed that 15 or 16 years is not a plateau and that this study was “too short of a period to draw conclusions.”