February 28, 2013
In a recent man-made climate change alarmist study entitled “Reductions in Labour Capacity From Heat Stress Under Climate Warming” which states that “a fundamental aspect of greenhouse-gas-induced warming is a global-scale increase in absolute humidity.”
Because of “continued warming” there will be an “increasingly severe limitation on human activity . . . during peak months of stress.”
This study was funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA).
Since humans are endothermic creatures (meaning they give off their own heat) this phenomenon, when combined with the heat produced by the electrical realities in densely populated cities, will increase the massive amount of heat exuded, therefore causing the temperature to rise in industrialized nations.
Another anti-human explanation for the myth of global warming is outlined in the study entitled “Energy Consumption and the Unexplained Winter Warning Over Northern Asia and North America”. The wasted energy from homes, buildings and cars in city centers rises into the atmosphere and raises the temperature by 1 degree Celsius which alarmist scientists say is causing massive climate change effects.
In cities where the most energy is expelled is also where the most energy is wasted. These nations as a whole include Russia, Canada, Northern Asia and the US.
Ming Cai, co-author of the study explains: “What causes that temperature change is not the energy consumption itself, rather the energy consumption changes the circulation, and that changed circulation causes additional warming in other places.”
Cai goes on to say: “That pattern is not some natural variability or something wrong with the models. It’s just that we haven’t considered this atmospheric forcing, which is energy consumption, in our model.”
In President Obama’s inaugural speech, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was imbued with new regulatory powers to encourage innovation in green technologies approved by the Obama administration for use in emergency or financial desperation. This authority is called patent pooling.
Because of this scheme, small farms will become victimized by extreme weather events with the taxpayer forced to cover costs while financial gain and protection remains with the corporations that directly compete with those small businesses.
With the social meme of national sacrifice being purveyed onto the public, this lays a simple foundation for corporate dominance and industry to takeover with governmentally approved projects contracted with private sector corporations to prioritize military interests.
Climate change paradigms and new accounting schemes are being devised by institutions such as Global Reporting Initiative that control the social mindset of costs and financial knowledge through co-opted reporting.
Last April a propaganda study published by Purdue and Stanford claimed that the unscientific fear-mongering of man-made climate change. Was the basis of supposed data and a federal mandate which would result in a rise in corn prices?
The study purports that because of recent extreme weather, attributed to man-made climate change without actual correlation, when added to the federal directive for biofuel production between 2020 – 2040 “there could be quite a substantial increase in yield volatility, and that’s due to the increased frequency and intensity of the high temperatures throughout the Corn Belt.”
Thomas Hertel, professor of agriculture for Purdue, stated that “closer integration of the corn and energy markets through the ethanol industry could aid in buffering these shocks, but this would not occur in the presence of a mandate.”
The US government requires ethanol to be added to gasoline. Ethanol consumes 39% of the corn crop in America. A large portion is added to the food system as by-products fed to livestock.
The entire study is based on the projections of computer models that are not reflective of the reality happening in real time, but a supposition of a possible future. Purdue used their own Global Trade Analysis Project model which does not take into account the volatile corn production yields and the inability to accurately predict the global climate change as proven by previous computer models that were used to scare the world’s populations into thinking that the planet was going to heat up.
From the computer model’s prediction, Stanford and Purdue are effecting futures of the corn prices which will in turn become a self-serving prophecy as food prices will rise; which will then by blamed on climate change. However, the actual origination for those higher food prices will have been studies like this that does not use actual science to create accurate predictions.
The study claims that even if temperatures remain as other climate change computer models predict, “global warming is likely to increase heat waves enough to cause much higher frequency of low-yield years, leading to greater volatility of corn prices,” say co-author of the Stanford study, Professor Noah Diffenbaugh.
In effect are the US government’s desire to take corn for ethanol over its use for food for human and livestock consumption. The preference for corn as bio-fuel indicates a clear agenda that benefits the oil industry at an enormous cost to the American public.
As corn prices rise, livestock producers will have to pay more to feed their cattle and consumers will be forced to provide the monetary difference at the grocery store.
When we analyze who will benefit from the rise in corn prices, we see that the oil corporations are a huge beneficiary because of the US government’s mandate that 39% of the corn yields be turned into ethanol to be added to gasoline.
Another beneficiary would be the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) because they have an estimated 2 -3 trillion dollars in trade for food producer’s futures. With the bankruptcy of MF Global, and the loss of monies that were traded by the brokerage through the CME, buying trends would be at a loss.
This study would actually boost their profit margins because futures are based on supposition; like this study is. Those suppositions are then used to buy and sell futures. And this study would generate considerable revenue for traders and the CME.
This study was funded by the US Department of Energy’s Office of Science. This agency also funds the authors of the study through various other monetary contributions.
Considering this fact, the entire study appears to be a fear-based propaganda stunt that is being purveyed as actual science to drive up food prices through indirectly affecting food production by threatening corn yields over the next 20 to 30 years.Add This to Technorati Faves