August 8, 2013
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has released their annual State of the Climate report that outlines rising sea levels, the melting of the ice caps, warmer oceans and the activity of humanity that is causing all of these problems.
NOAA states that 2012 was one of the hottest years in recorded history, which coincides with dramatic changes in weather patterns; such as the massive rainfall observed in West Africa.
Tom Karl, head of the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) explains that climate change science can be hard pressed to find a “natural variability” yet this assumption can be observed “if you compare that then to the whole suite of indicators that scientists are trying to look at, you see that no, that’s part of a pattern we’re seeing.”
With another report coming out in September, NOAA has stated without a doubt that humans are the sole reason for climate changes.
The American Geophysical Union (AGU) confirms this finding with a statement that reads: “Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years.”
The AGU declared: “Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. Extensive, independent observations confirm the reality of global warming. These observations show large-scale increases in air and sea temperatures, sea level, and atmospheric water vapor; they document decreases in the extent of mountain glaciers, snow cover, permafrost, and Arctic sea ice. These changes are broadly consistent with long understood physics and predictions of how the climate system is expected to respond to human-caused increases in greenhouse gases.”
With over 60,000 members, AGU believes that their opinion is representative of a consensus within the scientific community with regard to climate change.
A paper was published by John Cook that was proven to be a fraud. It contained doctored information that claimed alarmists have agreed that climate change is caused solely by anthropomorphic means alone.
Independent journalists looked into Cook’s claims and found that it was Cook’s colleagues that agreed with him; but this is not indicative of a complete accord within the scientific community.
Another obstacle was the amount of newly deemed classified documents that Cook used to create his “consensus”.
Nicola Scafetta found that: “Cook et al. (2013) is based on a straw man argument because it does not correctly define the IPCC AGW theory, which is NOT that human emissions have contributed 50%+ of the global warming since 1900 but that almost 90-100% of the observed global warming was induced by human emission. What my papers say is that the IPCC [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] view is erroneous because about 40-70% of the global warming observed from 1900 to 2000 was induced by the sun.”
Scaffetta went on to say: “What it is observed right now is utter dishonesty by the IPCC advocates. … They are gradually engaging into a metamorphosis process to save face. … And in this way they will get the credit that they do not merit, and continue in defaming critics like me that actually demonstrated such a fact since 2005/2006.”
Geoengineering projects are responsible for the reduction in rainfall, according to a study published in Earth System Dynamics, a journal of the European Geosciences Union. Findings showed that rainfall had reduced by 15% annually when compared to pre-industrial days in North America and Eurasia. The numbers are more drastic over South America and the Amazon areas, where an estimated 20% decrease was devised by computer models.
The paper states that: “Climate engineering cannot be seen as a substitute for a policy pathway of mitigating climate change through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.”
Geoengineering projects such as expressing sulfuric aerosols into the atmosphere to reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth’s surface have also caused devastating effects on plant life which need CO2 to live.
While these scientific facts are being ignored by alarmists, they might mean that the planet will not be able to return to a self-regulated temperature because of the geoengineering projects that various governments participate in.
The Belfort Group released a scientific report titled “Case Orange” wherein anonymous experts provided data to researchers proving without a doubt that geoengineering and chemtrails are causing the disruptions in natural weather patterns that is being experience across the globe; and subsequently blamed on humanity for the sake of pushing the environmental movement, carbon taxes and Agenda 21.
The report has been provided to the UN; NATO; embassies for the US, Germany, France, Iran, Russia, China and Venezuela.
Contained in the summary, it is shown that geoengineering is conducted for defense purposes by the US government with direct negative effects on public health and without regard for those consequences. Contained in chemtrails are the elements in significant amounts:
• Carbon dioxide
• Nitric oxide
• Sulfur oxide
• Carbon monoxide
Chemtrails are devastating to the earth’s eco-systems, effect the development of Cirrus clouds and create previously unclassified cloud formations which negatively affect surface temperature and precipitation levels.