January 17, 2013
Al Gore believes that the collective wisdom (i.e. social media) filters out ideas through social pressure and education of the masses by one another. Gore knows that environmental policies must be brought to the masses to unite them and encourage them to rise up against those who do not conform whether through online groups or social media because after this mindset changes, the reflection will be seen in the real world.
Gore leads the climate change march with authoritarian fervor by declaring that “all weather events are now affected by global warming pollution.” Just as human behaviors lead to disease, according to Gore, the rising sea levels are evidence that this ideology is true.
In a study published in 2002, there was a clear conclusion that with the fear-mongering ideology associated with Gore’s abrupt climate change, the “causes have not been clearly established, but the triggering of events is likely to be the result of multiple natural processes.”
The UN International Energy Agency (IEA) released the “World Energy Outlook” report in 2012 that [pointed to fossil fuels and government subsidies as the contribution to the global dependency on petrol which is destroying the planet.
Under the “New Policies Scenario” section of the report, for energy demands to move beyond methods that emit Co2, and replace them with UN approved renewable energy technology that will lower climate trends and influence the global economic growth.
By 2035, the IEA wants to see the world on a sustainable path that will force nations to conform to the new global standard. Redirecting the demand for petrol with natural gas and reducing the use of nuclear power for electricity, will cut off corporations from obtaining government subsidies to pay for their destruction of the planet.
Through controlling the global markets, the US would be forced to become the example that all other countries should follow and the path that international communities begin to take will alter from current pathways. Controlling the distribution of petrol would choke the demand out because in transporting the oil, there are CO2 emissions imposed upon the planet.
Armed with quickly published studies on hurricanes and man-made climate change, the alarmists decry that hurricanes are becoming more dangerous as evidenced by Hurricane Katrina or Sandy. They “experts” take advantage of the public’s ignorance on scientific issues against them by shifting the social meme without having to provide concrete documentation. Along with these fly-by-night studies, the mainstream media has aided with the shifting of the general public’s belief system and stance on global warming.
The same can be said of the claim that sea levels are rising; increasing to such a degree that portions of land will be sucked underwater by 2100 if changes are not made today.
By utilizing false data in studies, eco-fascists are able to twist the outcome to their own designs. Overstated future predictions on the effects of man-made climate change have to be carefully scrutinized without knee-jerk reactions. However, when the majority of the people are sold on the idea that man is directly influencing climate in a negative way, the problem is just as much a psychological control mechanism as it is combating fake studies that validate “truths” that are not true.
The Rothschild owned Weather Channel makes predictions about the future of weather on a regular basis that adds to the misinformation purveyed on the American public. The East Coast was specifically named as the area that will be hit by a “combination of weather impacts” repeatedly.
Lies become true mythology within the climate change movement. One justification for man-made global warming is the impact on biodiversity. In 2011, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) posted a blog last year entitled “Polar Bear Population in Canada’s Western Hudson Bay Unlikely to Survive Climate Disruption.”
They claimed the polar bear population was suffering due to man-made climate change. Gore used this ideal as well in his film An Inconvenient Truth.
Yet, a recent survey by the Government of Numavat in April of 2012 tells a completely different story. The region they monitored encompasses the Nunavat and Manitoba where polar bears live. This area is close to the Arctic.
Researchers found that polar bear populations are estimated at 66% higher than climate change alarmists predicted.
The claim of the drowning polar bears goes back to a federal study that was obviously doctored. The 2006 paper from the journal Polar Biology lacked any supporting evidence for its claims that “drowning-related deaths of polar bears may increase in the future if the observed trend of regression of pack ice and/or longer open-water periods continues.”
Biologist Charles Monnett, the lead scientist on the paper, who is currently working with the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, found a polar bear carcass and then devised the fairy tale that became the claim that polar bears were drowning.
In reality, the endgame of the environmental movement is defined by UN propaganda purveyed by the UN Environmental Program (UNEP). The 2012 Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-5) report states that only 4 out of the 90 goals for environmental change have been met. Climate change alarmists are decrying the earth is reaching an irreversible “tipping point”.
The GEO-5 is an international mandate for the world’s governments as outlined by the UN. The agency declares that lead-free gas, ozone depletion, access to clean water and research into marine pollution must be established to protect the biodiversity of plants and animals on our planet.
Achim Steiner, executive director for the UNEP, urges: “GEO-5 reminds world leaders and nations meeting at Rio+20 why a decisive and defining transition towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient, job-generating ‘green economy’ is urgently needed. If current trends continue, if current patterns of production and consumption of natural resources prevail and cannot be reversed, then governments will preside over unprecedented levels of damage and degradation.”
At the end of the climate change road is the implementation of carbon taxes that will control global markets through individual adherence by the nations of the world.
The global carbon emissions levels are allegedly rising exponentially, according to the Global Carbon Project (GCP). The GCP believes that as the world becomes “carbon neutral”, the impact of CO2 emissions will offset the damage caused and balance out in the end.
Their report entitled “Carbon Reductions and Offsets” governments, corporations and individuals can “participate in this voluntary market” and adhere to their recommendations for legally binding policies.
Profit driven business with regard to climate change demands” reductions [that are] outpacing the wider introduction of low-carbon technologies in transport, energy production and manufacturing.” Carbon offsets can provide this by being purchased ahead of projected measures to discover future innovations for eliminating carbon emissions.
Little known to the general public is that the lie of climate change was created by the Club of Rome in the 1970’s who stated that “in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and thus the real enemy, then, is humanity itself believed humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or one invented for the purpose.”